Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. v. Kim
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; denying without prejudice 10 Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/12/2014. Bum Sik Kim answer due up to and including 1/12/2015. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/5/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. (slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02634-CMA-MJW
PAK MAIL CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
BUM SIK KIM, individually,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time
(docket no. 17) is GRANTED.
If is FURTHER ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant’s Motion for Extension of
Time to Answer (docket no. 21) is GRANTED.
If is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default
Judgment (docket no. 10) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant shall have up to and
including January 12, 2015, to file his Answer, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, to the
Complaint. This court WILL NOT entertain any further extensions of time to Answer the
Complaint. If the Pro Se Defendant does not file his Answer by January 12, 2015, then
Plaintiff may re-file its Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is set for a Rule 16 Scheduling
Conference on February 5, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file their proposed
Rule 16 Scheduling Order five (5) business days prior to the Scheduling Conference.
Since the Defendant is Pro Se, the Plaintiff is responsible for filing the proposed
Scheduling Order electronically with the court.
Date: December 12, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?