Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. v. Kim

Filing 22

MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; denying without prejudice 10 Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/12/2014. Bum Sik Kim answer due up to and including 1/12/2015. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/5/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. (slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02634-CMA-MJW PAK MAIL CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. BUM SIK KIM, individually, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time (docket no. 17) is GRANTED. If is FURTHER ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (docket no. 21) is GRANTED. If is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment (docket no. 10) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant shall have up to and including January 12, 2015, to file his Answer, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, to the Complaint. This court WILL NOT entertain any further extensions of time to Answer the Complaint. If the Pro Se Defendant does not file his Answer by January 12, 2015, then Plaintiff may re-file its Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is set for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on February 5, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. The parties shall file their proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order five (5) business days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Since the Defendant is Pro Se, the Plaintiff is responsible for filing the proposed Scheduling Order electronically with the court. Date: December 12, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?