Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc. v. Kim
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 30 Plaintiff Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc.'s (Pak Mail) Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery, as set forth in the Order.Plaintiff Pak Mail's Second Motion for Default Judgment 24 is held in abeyance until Plaintiff Pak Mail can obtain the requested discovery. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/7/2015.(emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02634-CMA-MJW
PAK MAIL CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
BUM SIK KIM, individually,
Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY
(Docket No. 30)
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Having reviewed Plaintiff Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc.’s (“Pak Mail”)
Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery (Docket No. 30) in order to establish the
amount of damages it seeks in its Second Motion for Default Judgment (Docket
No. 24) against Defendant Bum Sik Kim (“Kim”), it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery (Docket No.
30) is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that
[1] Plaintiff Pak Mail shall be permitted to conduct limited discovery concerning
Bum Sik Kim’s revenues at the Franchised Location and the Mail Center from the
date the subject Franchise Agreement was signed by the parties to the present.
Plaintiff Pak Mail may serve five (5) requests for production of documents, fifteen
(15) interrogatories, and fifteen (15) requests for admissions, and may take the
deposition of Bum Sik Kim for five (5) hours; and
[2] Plaintiff Pak Mail’s Second Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 24) shall
be held in abeyance until Plaintiff Pak Mail can obtain the requested discovery.
Done this 7th day of May, 2015.
s/ Michael J. Watanabe
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?