Ortiz et al. v. Depriest et al.

Filing 48

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JAMES WITH PREJUDICE by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/30/15.(jdyne, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge R. Brooke Jackson Civil Action No 14-cv-02639-RBJ ANSELMO ORTIZ ORTIZ, JOHANNA ORTIZ, and ARMANDO ORTIZ, Plaintiffs, v. TRAVIS DePRIEST, Colorado State Patrol, STEVEN JOHNSON, Colorado State Patrol, GEORGE DINGFELDER, Colorado State Patrol, TODD JAMES, Colorado State Patrol MARK TROSTEL, Colorado State Patrol, DOYLE EICHER, Colorado State Patrol, JOHN DOE 3, Colorado State Patrol, LINETTE SCHMIDT, Colorado State Patrol, JOHN DOE 2, Colorado State Patrol, JOHN DOE 3, Colorado State Patrol, BILL RITTER, State of Colorado, ROBERT A. GURULE, Conejos County Sheriff’s Office, JOHN DOE 1, Conejos County Sheriff’s Office, LOUIS GALLEGOS, Louis’ Paint and Body, JULIE L. MYERS, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, EDWARD TOLBERT, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JOHN P. LONGSHORE, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, HARRY M. QUALANTONE, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and HOLLY LANDGREN, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Defendants. 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JAMES WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice All Claims Against Defendant Todd James (ECF No. 35) in his Individual Capacity. Good grounds having been shown, it is therefore ORDERED that: Defendant Todd James is hereby dismissed in his individual capacity with prejudice from this action, each party to pay its own attorneys’ fees and costs DATED this 30th day of January, 2015. BY THE COURT: ___________________________________ R. Brooke Jackson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?