Knight et al v. Bieneman et al
Filing
37
FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 36 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, by Clerk (dhans, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 14-cv-2641-WJM-CBS
EUGENE KNIGHT, L.K., by and through her next friend Eugene Knight, and
A.K., by and through his next friend Eugene Knight,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PAULA BIENEMAN, in her official capacity as Principal of Palmer Elementary School,
LEE COOPER, in his official capacity as Deputy Instructional Superintendent of Denver
Public Schools, and
TOM BOASBERG, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Denver Public
Schools,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all Orders entered
during the pendency of this case and the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction entered by the Honorable
William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on January 14, 2015,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 9) is DENIED
and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s claims brought under the United States Constitution are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.
The Court DECLINES JURISDICTION over Plaintiff’s claims
brought under the Colorado Constitution, and such claims are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered for Defendants and
against the Plaintiffs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are awarded costs upon the filing of
a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of Court within fourteen days after entry of Final Judgment.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of January 2015.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/Deborah Hansen
Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?