Alarid v. Biomet, Inc et al

Filing 111

ORDER Granting 105 Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Withdraw Certain Affirmative Defenses from the 38 Amended Answer to Complaint, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/20/2016.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 14-cv-02667-REB-NYW ALFONSO A. ALARID, Plaintiff, v. BIOMET, INC., BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, BIOMET MANUFACTURING, LLC, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Blackburn, J. The matter before me is Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Withdraw Certain Affirmative Defenses [#105],1 filed January 14, 2016. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendants' Unopposed Motion To Withdraw Certain Affirmative Defenses [#105], filed January 14, 2016, is granted; and 2. That the affirmative defenses enumerated as 1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 22, 26, 30, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 45, 48, and 50 are withdrawn from the Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Defendants Biomet, Inc., Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, and Biomet Manufacturing, LLC [#38], filed April 3, 2015. 1 “[#105]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Dated January 20, 2016, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?