Conry v. Barker
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply; and Request for Telephonic Hearing 14 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff seeks leave to file a Sur-reply. The Motion is denied to the extent that Plaintiff requests a telephonic hearing on her request for leave to file a sur-reply, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/8/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02672-CMA-KLM
SUZANNE CONRY, an individual
Plaintiff,
v.
EUGENE H. BAKER, an individual,
BERNARD C. MAYNES, an individual,
B&B 2ND MORTGAGE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
B&B VENTURES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
HIGH POINTE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
TERRY D. HAMILTON, an individual,
CHEM-AWAY, INC., a Colorado corporation,
SHARON M. HAMILTON, an individual, and
CHEM-AWAY, INC., a California corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Sur-reply; and Request for Telephonic Hearing [#14] (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#14] is GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part. The Motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff seeks leave to file a Sur-reply.
The Motion is denied to the extent that Plaintiff requests a telephonic hearing on her
request for leave to file a sur-reply.
Dated: December 8, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?