Conry v. Barker

Filing 98

ORDER; This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On March 13, 2015, the Clerk of Court entered default as to each of these three Defendants. Clerks Entry of Default [#47, #48]. However, since that time, Plaintiff has failed to either seek defaul t judgment against them or dismiss them from this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before August 14, 2015, Plaintiff shall either (1) seek default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) as to each of these Defendants, or (2) s eek voluntary dismissal of each of these Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.41(a)(1)(A)(i). Failure to timely respond to this order will result in a recommendation that these Defendants be dismissed from this lawsuit, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/24/15. (morti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02672-CMA-KLM SUZANNE CONRY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. EUGENE H. BAKER, an individual, BERNARD C. MAYNES, an individual, B&B 2ND MORTGAGE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, B&B VENTURES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, HIGH POINTE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, TERRY D. HAMILTON, an individual, CHEM-AWAY, INC., a Colorado corporation, SHARON M. HAMILTON, an individual, and CHEM-AWAY, INC., a California corporation, Defendants, and TERRY D. HAMILTON, an individual, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. THOMAS W. METCALF, an individual; THOMAS W. METCALF, ATTORNEY AT LAW, a professional law firm; ROBERT E. RAY, an individual; LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT E. RAY, a professional law firm, Third-Party Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court sua sponte. It has come to the Court’s attention that Defendant Sharon M. Hamilton, Defendant Chem-Away, Inc., a California corporation, and -1- Defendant Chem-Away, Inc., a Colorado corporation, have apparently been served but have not yet entered an appearance in this matter. See Summons [#10] (providing proofs of service on these three Defendants). On March 13, 2015, the Clerk of Court entered default as to each of these three Defendants. Clerk’s Entry of Default [#47, #48]. However, since that time, Plaintiff has failed to either seek default judgment against them or dismiss them from this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before August 14, 2015, Plaintiff shall either (1) seek default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) as to each of these Defendants, or (2) seek voluntary dismissal of each of these Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Failure to timely respond to this order will result in a recommendation that these Defendants be dismissed from this lawsuit. Dated: July 24, 2015 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?