Whittle v. Marley et al

Filing 75

ORDER Granting 74 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff'sSecond Amended Complaint is accepted as filed, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/21/15. (ktera)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 2014-CV-002680-RPM-KLM SHANE WHITTLE, INDIVIDUALLY, Plaintiff, v. ROHAN MARLEY, CEDELLA MARLEY, JAMMIN’ JAVA CORPORATION, HOPE ROAD MERCHANDISING, LLC, FIFTY-SIX HOPE ROAD MUSIC LIMITED, MARLEY COFFEE ESTATE LIMITED, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT _____________________________________________________________________________ This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”) [Doc. 74], the Court having reviewed the Motion, and being fully apprised in the premises: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is accepted as FILED. DATED: September 21st, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ___________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?