Whittle v. Marley et al

Filing 75

ORDER Granting 74 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff'sSecond Amended Complaint is accepted as filed, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/21/15. (ktera)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 2014-CV-002680-RPM-KLM
SHANE WHITTLE, INDIVIDUALLY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROHAN MARLEY,
CEDELLA MARLEY,
JAMMIN’ JAVA CORPORATION,
HOPE ROAD MERCHANDISING, LLC,
FIFTY-SIX HOPE ROAD MUSIC LIMITED,
MARLEY COFFEE ESTATE LIMITED,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
_____________________________________________________________________________
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for
Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”) [Doc. 74], the Court having reviewed the
Motion, and being fully apprised in the premises:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
Second Amended Complaint is accepted as FILED.
DATED: September 21st, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
___________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge