O'Dowd v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc. et al
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER; 25 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is GRANTED in part. Without seeking leave from the Court, Plaintiff may file a new version of her proposed Amended Complaint that complies with Local Rule 10.1(e) on the docket. That version of the proposed Amended Complaint will become the operative pleading in this case without further order of the Court, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/21/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02787-KLM
LAURAL O’DOWD, for herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS, INC., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., doing business as
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and
WELLPOINT, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion For Leave to
Amend Complaint [#25]1 (the “Motion”). On January 14, 2015, the Court struck Plaintiff’s
tendered amended complaint [#23] and informed Plaintiff that if she
wishes to amend her Complaint, she must file either (1) a notice stating that
Defendants do not oppose amendment which attaches the proposed
amended complaint and a document showing the changes Plaintiff wishes to
make as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1 or (2) an opposed motion that
complies with all applicable rules, on or before January 21, 2015.
Minute Order [#24] at 2 (emphasis in original). The Court also informed Plaintiff about the
requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e). Id. at 1. Regarding
Local Rule 10.1(e), the Court noted that the rule “requires that all pleadings and documents
be double spaced.” Id. The proposed Amended Complaint attached to the Motion [#25-2]
does not comply with Local Rule 10.1(e). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#25] is GRANTED in part. Without
1
“[#25]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
1
seeking leave from the Court, Plaintiff may file a new version of her proposed Amended
Complaint that complies with Local Rule 10.1(e) on the docket. That version of the
proposed Amended Complaint will become the operative pleading in this case without
further order of the Court.
Dated: January 21, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?