Pedro v. United States of America
Filing
51
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 8/21/2015. Denying 39 Motion for Order. Denying with prejudice 42 Motion for Order. Denying without prejudice 43 Motion to Compel. Denying without prejudice 35 Motion for Order. Withdrawing 36 Motion to Compel. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 14‐cv‐02789‐RBJ‐CBS
Date: August 21, 2015
Courtroom Deputy: Amanda Montoya
FTR – Reporter Deck‐Courtroom A402
Parties:
Counsel:
MARTIN PEDRO,
Pro se (by phone)
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Mark Pestal
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in session: 09:58 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The court reviews pending motions.
ORDERED: [42] Motion Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 28(a)(1)(B) to Appoint or Designate a Person
Before Them Questions May Be Taken is DENIED with prejudice as stated on
the record.
[35] Motion for Order is DENIED without prejudice. Once Mr. Pedro has the
depositions set up, he shall file a new motion and the Clerk’s office will issue the
appropriate subpoenas.
[43] Petition Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 45 Compelling Attendant of Non-Party
Witnesses at Deposition is DENIED without prejudice.
Mr. Pedro makes oral motion ti withdraw [36] Motion to Compel.
ORDERED: Mr. Pedro’s oral motion in GRANTED and [36] Motion to Compel is
WITHDRAWN.
[39] Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civil Procedure Rule 36 Motion Regarding the
Sufficiency of an Answer or Objection is DENIED. The court will allow Mr.
Pedro to serve specific interrogatories towards the Defendant’s answers to the
requests for admission.
Discussion regarding scheduling depositions.
Hearing Concluded.
Court in recess: 10:30 a.m.
Time in court: 00:32
To order transcripts of hearings please contact Stevens‐Koenig Reporting at (303) 988‐8470.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?