Lobato-Wright et al v. Manjarres et al

Filing 120

ORDER. ORDERED: This case is dismissed with prejudice and judgment shall enter in favor of defendant on all of plaintiffs' claims. Within 14 days of the entry of judgment, defendant may have his costs by filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of the Court. This case is closed, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/2/18. (sgrim, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 14-cv-02957-PAB-MJW STANLEY CREIGHTON LOBATO-WRIGHT and TODD ANTHONY LOBATO-WRIGHT, Plaintiffs, v. GERRITT KOSER, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court on its order to show cause [Docket No. 119]. On November 30, 2017, defendant Gerritt Koser filed a motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 108. On December 20, 2017, the Court granted plaintiffs an extension of time to respond to the motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 110. On January 2, 2018, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion to withdraw and plaintiffs filed a second motion for an extension of time. Docket Nos. 111, 112. The Court granted the second motion for an extension of time, allowing plaintiffs until February 5, 2018 to respond to the summary judgment motion. Docket No. 114. On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe allowed plaintiffs’ counsel to withdraw and reminded plaintiffs of the February 5, 2018 deadline for their response to the motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 118. Plaintiffs did not respond to the motion for summary judgment or seek an extension to do so. On February 16, 2018, the Court ordered plaintiffs to show cause by February 27, 2018 why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1. Docket No. 119 at 2. In addition to m ailing a copy of the order to plaintiffs’ address of record, the Court emailed its order to plaintiffs. Id. at 2-3. There has been no indication that plaintif fs did not receive the Court’s February 16, 2018 order, such as a letter returned as undeliverable. Plaintiffs have not responded to the order to show cause. Because plaintiffs have failed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the Court will dismiss this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice and judgment shall enter in favor of defendant on all of plaintiffs’ claims. It is further ORDERED that, within 14 days of the entry of judgment, defendant may have his costs by filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of the Court. It is further ORDERED that this case is closed. DATED March 2, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?