Weaver v. Silva et al
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/13/15 GRANTING 66 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Exhibits. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO RESTRICT documents [#44-1] and [#58-1] as Level 1 restricted documents.The previously scheduled Status Conference set for October 13, 2015 at 11:30 a.m. is hereby VACATED.(nmarb, ) Modified on 10/13/2015 to add Status Conference information. (nmarb, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-02963-RM-NYW
CITY OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO,
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This matter is before the court on the Joint Stipulated Motion Concerning the Second
Amended Complaint and the Third Amended Complaint (“Joint Motion”) [#66] filed on
September 29, 2015, which was referred to this Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of
Reference dated January 7, 2015 [#15], the Reassignment dated February 10, 2015 [#20], and the
Memorandum September 29, 2015 [#67]. Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Motion and
the Order of Dismissal of Parties With Prejudice (“Order of Dismissal”) dated September 30,
2015 [#69] and the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Defendant City of Steamboat
Springs, Colorado [#70] filed on October 12, 2015, and finding good cause, IT IS ORDERED:
The Joint Motion [#66] is GRANTED;
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO RESTRICT documents [#44-1] and
[#58-1] as Level 1 restricted documents;
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO ACCEPT the filing of [#66-1] and
[#66-2] pursuant to a Notice of Filing Substitute Exhibits, but nothing in this
Order suggests that either the proposed Second Amended Complaint [#66-1] or
the Third Amended Complaint [#66-2] have been accepted for filing; and
The previously scheduled Status Conference set for October 13, 2015 at 11:30
a.m. is hereby VACATED.
DATED: October 13, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?