Eden v. Cozza-Rhodes
Filing
26
ORDER to File Supplement to Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/26/15. (morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03014-GPG
CASEY D. EDEN,
Applicant,
v.
T. COZZA-RHODES,
Respondent.
ORDER TO FILE SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
As part of the preliminary consideration of the amended Application for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 14) in this action, the Court ordered
Respondent to file a Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative defense of
exhaustion of administrative remedies with respect to the execution of his sentence. On
February 17, 2015, Respondent filed a Preliminary Response (ECF No. 23) that addresses
the exhaustion question. In addition, on February 18, 2015, Respondent filed a “Status
Report,” which appears to indicate that Petitioner’s sentencing credit claim now is moot.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order
Respondent shall file a supplement to the Preliminary Response that addresses whether
Applicant’s Application for sentencing credit now is moot. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the
supplement to the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply to the supplement, if
he desires.
DATED March 26, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Gordon P. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?