Celestine v. State of Colorado et al

Filing 32

ORDER adopting 29 Report and Recommendation; this action is DISMISSED. by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/19/15.(jdyne, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 14-cv-03058-LTB-KLM DEWAYNE CELESTINE, individually and on behalf of any other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, RICK RAEMISCH, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, ROGER WERHOLTZ, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, TONY CAROCHI, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, TOM CLEMENTS, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, by and through his estate, ARISTEDES ZAVARIS, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, JOE ORTIZ, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, and JOHN SUTHERS, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director for CDOC, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on May 1, 2015 (Doc 29). Plaintiff was mailed a copy of the referenced Order and Recommendation on May 1, 2015. Said Order and Recommendation was returned to the Court with a label stating “Return to Sender - Refused - Unable to Forward - Return to Sender” (Doc 31 - filed May 12, 2015). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and this action is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: May 19, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?