Beltran v. Noonan et al

Filing 1230

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses is GRANTED. (Doc. # 1206 .) Class Counsel shall receive attorneys' fees in the amount of $22,925,000, from t he Qualified Settlement Fund ("QSF"), representing 35% of the QSF; In addition to attorneys' fees, Class Counsel shall receive $3,345,535.33 for litigation expenses and expenses for administration of the settlement and sen ding of notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715, which shall also be deducted from the QSF; and $536 shall be taxed from the QSF in favor of the United States as reimbursement for in forma pauperis filing and service fees advanced on behalf of the lead named Plaintiff, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/18/2019. (evana, )

Download PDF
Case 1:14-cv-03074-CMA-KMT Document 1230 Filed 07/18/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 14-cv-03074-CMA-KMT JOHANA PAOLA BELTRAN, LUSAPHO HLATSHANENI, BEAUDETTE DEETLEFS, ALEXANDRA IVETTE GONZALEZ, JULIANE HARNING, NICOLE MAPLEDORAM, LAURA MEJIA JIMENEZ, SARAH CAROLINE AZUELA RASCON, CAMILA GABRIELA PEREZ REYES, CATHY CARAMELO, LINDA ELIZABETH, And those similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, INTEREXCHANGE, INC., USAUPAIR, INC., GREATAUPAIR, LLC, EXPERT GROUP INTERNATIONAL INC., d/b/a Expert AuPair, EURAUPAIR INTERCULTURAL CHILD CARE PROGRAMS, CULTURAL HOMESTAY INTERNATIONAL, CULTURAL CARE, INC., d/b/a Cultural Care Au Pair, AUPAIRCARE INC., AU PAIR INTERNATIONAL, INC., APF GLOBAL EXCHANGE, NFP, d/b/a/ Aupair Foundation, AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR FOREIGN STUDY, d/b/a Au Pair in America, AMERICAN CULTURAL EXCHANGE, LLC, d/b/a GoAuPair, AGENT AU PAIR, A.P.E.X. AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL EXCHANGE, LLC, d/b/a ProAuPair, 20/20 CARE EXCHANGE, INC., d/b/a The International Au Pair Exchange, ASSOCIATES IN CULTURAL EXCHANGE, d/b/a GoAuPair, and GOAUPAIR OPERATIONS, LLC, d/b/a GoAuPair, Defendants. Case 1:14-cv-03074-CMA-KMT Document 1230 Filed 07/18/19 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses. (Doc. # 1206.) The Court held a hearing regarding Plaintiffs’ request that the Court finally approve the class and collective settlement and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses on July 18, 2019. See (Doc. # 1228.) The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, all documents related thereto, and the relevant facts and law, hereby finds that upon due consideration of the non-exclusive factors set forth in Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474, 482 n.4 (10th Cir. 1994) (citing Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717–19 (5th Cir. 1974)), the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ requested fees and expenses are fair, reasonable and appropriate. See also Davis v. Crilly, 292 F. Supp. 3d 1167, 1173-74 (D. Colo. 2018) (discussing attorneys’ fees standard for Fair Labor Standards Act settlements). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses is GRANTED. (Doc. # 1206.) 2. Class Counsel shall receive attorneys’ fees in the amount of $22,925,000, from the Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”), representing 35% of the QSF; 3. In addition to attorneys’ fees, Class Counsel shall receive $3,345,535.33 for litigation expenses and expenses for administration of the settlement and sending of notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715, which shall also be deducted from the QSF; and 4. $536 shall be taxed from the QSF in favor of the United States as reimbursement 2 Case 1:14-cv-03074-CMA-KMT Document 1230 Filed 07/18/19 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3 for in forma pauperis filing and service fees advanced on behalf of the lead named Plaintiff. DATED: July 18, 2019 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?