Campos v. Mantech International Corporation

Filing 57

MINUTE ORDER denying 48 Motion for Costs by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/13/2015. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty re: 46 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Compel Di scovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, or in the Alternative, Motion to Extend Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Defendant Responding to Plaintiffs Interrogatories; 51 Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, Motion to Terminate or Limit Courts Motion to Compel Attendance; and 55 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Deposition Pursuant to FRCP Rule 32(a)(5)(A)... (mdave, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03088-MSK-MEH WILLIAM CAMPOS, Plaintiff, v. MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 13, 2015. Plaintiff’s Motion for Witness Fees and Witness Mileage, or in the Alternative, Motion for Plaintiff’s Actual Costs to Attend Deposition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1821 [filed August 5, 2015; docket #48] is denied. Section 1821 does not apply to the Plaintiff. See Green Constr. Co. v. Kan. Power & Light Co., 153 F.R.D. 670, 679 (D. Kan. 1994) (the expenses of witnesses who are parties to the litigation and who are personally involved in the litigation are not taxable). In addition, the Plaintiff incorrectly asserts that the Court “order[ed] Plaintiff to appear at Defendant’s offices at 1900 Sixteenth Street, Denver, Colorado, on August 7, 2015.” Rather, the Court simply ordered, To accommodate the Plaintiff’s travel schedule, the Court will grant the Defendant’s alternative request to extend the discovery cutoff to August 7, 2015. During this extended time period, the Plaintiff shall cooperate with defense counsel to schedule a date and time for Plaintiff’s deposition. Docket #45. Also, before the Court are Plaintiff’s “Unopposed” Motion to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, or in the Alternative, Motion to Extend Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Defendant Responding to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories [docket #46], Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions, or in the Alternative, Motion to Terminate or Limit Court’s Motion [sic] to Compel Attendance [docket #51], and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Deposition Pursuant to FRCP Rule 32(a)(5)(A) ... [docket #55]. The Court will hold a hearing on these motions on Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient, counsel should confer with opposing counsel and contact my Chambers to obtain an alternate date. The Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant may appear at this hearing by telephone by first teleconferencing together, then calling my chambers at (303) 844-4507. Otherwise, please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2(b). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?