Reiskin et al v. Regional Transportation District
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiffs' #62 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Class Action Complaint is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiffs Amended Class Action Complaint [#62-2] for filing as of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Third Amended Class Action Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/19/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03111-REB-KLM
JULIE REISKIN,
JON JAMIE LEWIS,
WILLIAM JOE BEAVER,
DOUGLAS HOWEY,
DIANA MILNE,
TINA MCDONALD,
JOSE TORRES-VEGA,
RANDY KILBOURN,
JOHN BABCOCK,
KIMBERLEY JACKSON,
PAULINA BLACK,
RUTHIE MCNAIR,
VRLINA NOZLIC, and
COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, on behalf of themselves and others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File
Third Amended Class Action Complaint [#62]1 (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#62] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiff’s
1
“[#62]” is an example of the convention the Court uses to identify the docket number
assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system
(CM/ECF). The Court uses this convention throughout this Minute Order.
1
Amended Class Action Complaint [#62-2] for filing as of the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to
the Third Amended Class Action Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated: June 19, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?