Ferrin v. Level 3 Communications, LLC Short-Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 41

MINUTE ORDER striking 39 Amended Motion Requesting Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/21/2015.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03114-REB-KLM CHANTEE FERRIN, Plaintiff, v. LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion Requesting Discovery [#39] (the “Amended Motion”). The Court denied without prejudice Plaintiff’s initial Motion Requesting Discovery [#36] for failure to confer pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a). Minute Order [#38]. The Amended Motion [#39] corrects that error. However, the Court also noted that the original Motion failed to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e), which mandates that “[a]ll pleadings and documents shall be double spaced.” Minute Order [#38]. The Court warned Plaintiff that “[a]ny documents filed in the future which do not comply with this rule may be summarily stricken.” Id. The present Amended Motion [#39] fails to correct that error. Given the Court’s explicit reminder, which was provided to Plaintiff less than two weeks before the present Amended Motion was filed, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 10.1(e). The Motion may be denied on this basis alone. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#39] is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 10.1(e). Dated: December 21, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?