Wright v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Filing
40
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 4/17/15. ORDERED that when filing restricted documents, parties MUST fully comply with the requirements of D.C.ColoL.CivR. 7.2. (cbssec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03130-WYD-CBS
WILLIAM WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
v.
XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.,
Defendant.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Entry of
Protective Order. The Court has reviewed that Motion and finds that the Motion is meritorious and
acceptable. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Parties have stipulated and agreed to the terms of and entry of this Stipulated
Protective Order.
2.
Pursuant to Rule 26(c), this Stipulated Protective Order shall govern the handling
of documents, materials, and information including without limitation, depositions, deposition
exhibits, responses to any discovery requests, including responses to interrogatories, document
requests, and requests for admissions and any other information produced, given or exchanged by
and among the Parties and non-parties to this action.
3.
As used in this Stipulated Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of
this term.
4.
Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that has
previously been maintained in a confidential manner, is confidential and/or is entitled to protection
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1), and that contains (a) personnel information concerning current and
former employees of Defendant, to the extent that such information implicates privacy interests
and is not generally known to the public; (b) proprietary business information of Defendant,
including but not limited to financial information, operational data, business plans and competitive
analyses and other sensitive information that, if not restricted as set forth in this Order, may subject
the producing or disclosing person to competitive or financial injury or potential legal liability to
third parties; (c) information containing trade secrets; (d) internal cost, compensation, recruiting
and retention data; and (e) information relating to Plaintiff concerning personal and/or confidential
matters not generally known to the public, such as, but not limited to, Plaintiff’s financial and
medical information. Documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be first reviewed by a
lawyer who will confirm that the designation is based on a good faith belief that the information
is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1). Parties and
attorneys designating documents as “Confidential” will be representing that such documents
contain information the disclosure of which would implicate an important interest to be protected
which outweighs the presumption of public access, and that they will be able to identify to the
Court a clearly defined and serious injury that would result if access is not restricted, as required
by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(b)(2) & (3).
5.
CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information (collectively
“CONFIDENTIAL information”) shall be used solely for the purpose of this action, and shall not,
without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be used, transferred,
2
disclosed, summarized, described, or communicated in any way, except that such information may
be disclosed to:
(a) attorneys actively working on this case;
(b) persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the
case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other
proceedings in this case;
(c) the Parties, and their employees with a need to know;
(d) expert witnesses, consultants and investigators retained in connection with this
proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in
this case;
(e) the Court, its employees and members of the Jury (“Court Personnel”);
(f) stenographic reporters and videographers who are engaged in proceedings necessarily
incident to the conduct of this action;
(g) deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses;
(h) individuals serving as mediators with regard to these proceedings;
(i) other persons by written agreement of the Parties; and
(j) Independent providers of document reproduction, electronic discovery or other
litigation services retained or employed specifically in connection with this lawsuit.
6.
Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above
(other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel, stenographic reporters and
videographers), counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order
and obtain from such person an executed “Written Assurance” in the form attached hereto as
3
Exhibit A. All such written assurances shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in
camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by opposing counsel.
7.
No copies of CONFIDENTIAL documents and materials shall be made except by
or on behalf of the persons listed in the subsections of paragraph 5 above. To the extent such
authorized persons require copies of CONFIDENTIAL documents or materials, any such copies
shall be used solely for the purposes permitted hereunder.
8.
Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in
a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice:
“CONFIDENTIAL.” Applying the “CONFIDENTIAL” marking to a document does not mean
that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for
the purposes of this Order.
9.
In the event Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) is disclosed or discovered in
the course of this litigation, including, but not limited to, ESI provided in a native format on hard
disks or other magnetic data storage disks, removable disks and/or drives, portions thereof, or
digital images of data storage disks or drives, such information may be designated as
CONFIDENTIAL in a written communication or in an electronic mail message to the nonproducing party or parties.
10.
Any Party who inadvertently fails to identify documents or information as
CONFIDENTIAL shall, promptly upon discovery of its oversight, provide written notice of the
error and substitute appropriately-designated documents. Any Party receiving such improperlydesignated documents shall promptly retrieve such documents from persons not entitled to receive
4
those documents and, upon receipt of the substitute documents, shall return or destroy the
improperly-designated documents.
11.
Any Party who inadvertently discloses documents that are privileged or protected
by the work product doctrine shall, promptly upon discovery of such inadvertent disclosure, so
advise the receiving Party and request that the documents be returned. The receiving Party shall
return such inadvertently produced documents, including all copies and copies the receiving Party
provided to any other individual or entity, within 14 days of receiving such a written request. The
inadvertent disclosure or production of any information or document that is subject to an objection
on the basis of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, including, but not limited, to
information or documents that may be considered Confidential Information under the Stipulated
Qualified Protective Order, will not be deemed to waive a party’s claim to its privileged or
protected nature or estop that party or the privilege holder from designating the information or
document as attorney-client privileged or subject to the work product doctrine at a later date.
12.
Before any Party submits documents, including motions, briefs, and exhibits,
containing Confidential Discovery Material to the Court, that Party shall first determine whether
it is feasible to redact as appropriate personal identifying information such as social security
numbers and full names of non-party individuals with privacy interests so that the individual
cannot be identified on basis of the exhibit itself, and other Confidential information to the extent
feasible so that it is not necessary to file the material under restricted access. If the presence of
Confidential Discovery Material cannot be redacted sufficiently to avoid filing it under restricted
access, the filing Party shall request that the submissions, or portions thereof, be filed under
restricted access in accordance with Local Rule 7.2, including a motion to restrict access setting
5
forth the requirements of Local Rule 7.2(c)1-5. The non-filing Party may also file a motion to
restrict access if the filing party fails to do so. The Parties shall attempt to agree on whether
particular material must be filed with a motion to restrict access before it is filed. To the extent
that Court Rules governing the E-filing of documents modify the procedures for filing Confidential
Discovery Material under restricted access, the Parties shall follow such rules. All such materials
so filed shall be released from confidential treatment only upon further order of the Court.
13.
Any request to restrict access must comply with the requirements of
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.
14.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information,
the portions thereof that involve the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information shall be
designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject to the provisions of this Stipulated Protective
Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but
a party may designate portions of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided
written notice of the designation is promptly given to all counsel of record within thirty (30) days
after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the transcript. Transcript pages containing
CONFIDENTIAL information must be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to
the top of each such page the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” as instructed by the party or non-party
offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony.
15.
A Party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information
by giving written notice to the Party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall
identify the information to which the objection is made. If the Parties cannot resolve the objection
within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the
6
Party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion requesting
that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this
Stipulated Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be
treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order until the Court
rules on the motion. If the designating Party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time,
the disputed information shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be
treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Stipulated Protective Order. In connection
with a motion filed under this provision, the Party designating the information as
CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed
information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
16.
At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon, within
sixty (60) business days after the final resolution each document and all copies thereof which have
been designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall be returned to the Party that designated it
CONFIDENTIAL, or the Parties may elect to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents. Where the
Parties agree to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents and materials, the destroying Party shall
certify in writing that the CONFIDENTIAL documents and materials have been destroyed.
17.
This Order is subject to modification by the Court on its own motion or on the
motion of any party or any other person with standing concerning the subject matter. The Order
must not, however, be modified until the parties have been given notice.
18.
The Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order will terminate on
the final disposition of this Lawsuit. A party may file a motion to seek leave to reopen the case to
enforce the provisions of this Order.
7
19.
This Stipulated Protective Order shall not be construed as a waiver of any right to
object to the authenticity, admissibility or confidentiality of any evidence at trial nor shall it be
deemed or construed as a waiver of any right to object to the furnishing of information in response
to any discovery request. This Stipulated Protective Order shall also not be deemed or construed
as a waiver of the attorney/client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other privilege or of the
rights of any party, person or entity to oppose the production of any documents or information on
any grounds. Further, nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall be construed to limit,
restrict or otherwise affect the ability of any party to seek the production of documents, testimony
or information from any source.
20.
Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall preclude any party from filing a
motion seeking further or different protection from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential
Information shall be treated at trial.
21.
This Stipulated Protective Order shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute an
admission by either of the stipulating parties or a determination by the Court as to any contested
issue in this case, including, without limitation, the existence or non-existence of a privacy interest
or privilege relating to said Confidential Information or its admissibility at trial or limit the parties’
rights to object to the disclosure of Confidential Information at the trial in this matter or in
discovery or litigation of this matter.
8
April
DATED and entered in Denver, Colorado this ____ day of _________________, 2015.
17th
BY THE COURT:
Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BERENBAUM WEINSHIENK, PC
MARTINEZ LAW GROUP, P.C.
By: /s/ Rosemary Orsini
Rosemary Orsini
370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4800
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 592-8305
Fax: (303) 629-7610
By: /s/ Meghan W. Martinez
Meghan W. Martinez
Dayna L. Dowdy
720 South Colorado Boulevard
South Tower, Suite 1020
Denver, Colorado 80246
Telephone: (303) 597-4000
Fax: (303) 597-4001
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03130-WYD-CBS
WILLIAM WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
v.
XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC.,
Defendant.
EXHIBIT A TO PROTECTIVE ORDER – WRITTEN ASSURANCE
I, _________________________________________ the undersigned, hereby declare that:
I reside at _______________________________________ in the City of __________________,
County of _____________________________________, State of ____________________. My
telephone number is ___________________.
I acknowledge that I have been informed that a Stipulated Protective Order issued by the Court in
the above captioned civil action requires confidentiality with respect to information designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” and therefore I agree to keep all such information and materials strictly and
absolutely confidential, and in all other respects be bound by the provisions of the Stipulated
Protective Order.
Executed on ______________________
(Date)
___________________________
(Signature)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?