Petersen v. Correctional Healthcare Companies et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, ONLY: Plaintiff's 10 Unopposed Motion to Dismiss without prejudice Defendant Correctional Healthcare Companies is GRANTED; and that the claims of the plaintiff against defendant Correctional Healthcare Companies are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/22/2014. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03182-REB-BNB
CHERYL PETERSEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, a Delaware Foreign Corporation, and
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Pennsylvania Corporation,
Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO
DEFENDANT CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, ONLY
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss
Without Prejudice Defendant Correctional Healthcare Companies, Only [#10]1 filed
January 12, 2015. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion
should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice
Defendant Correctional Healthcare Companies, Only [#10] filed January 12, 2015, is
GRANTED; and
2. That the claims of the plaintiff against defendant, Correctional Healthcare

1

“[#10]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

Companies, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. That defendant, Correctional Healthcare Companies, is DROPPED as a
named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated January 22, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2