Seidman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
61
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2016 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with the 30(b)(6) Deposition 50 is DENIED, for reasons stated on record, but subje ct to bringing another motion for additional hours with a 30 (b)(6) witness if investigation of the cases list provided by Defendant but not submitted to Plaintiff's counsel until the night before the 30(b)(6) provides grounds as discussed. Defendant is not required to provide any additional information to Plaintiff. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:
14-cv-03193-WJM-KMT
Sabrina Grimm
Date: January 22, 2016
FTR: Courtroom C-201
Parties:
Counsel:
LAWRENCE SEIDMAN,
Daniel Kay
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Jacquelyn Booker
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
9:51 a.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics notice, unreasonable delay and denial, and
sanctions.
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with the 30(b)(6)
Deposition [50] is DENIED, for reasons stated on record, but subject to
bringing another motion for additional hours with a 30(b)(6) witness if
investigation of the cases list provided by Defendant but not submitted to
Plaintiff’s counsel until the night before the 30(b)(6) provides grounds as
discussed. Defendant is not required to provide any additional information
to Plaintiff.
10:48 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 00:57
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at 303-988-8470.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?