Seidman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 61

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2016 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with the 30(b)(6) Deposition 50 is DENIED, for reasons stated on record, but subje ct to bringing another motion for additional hours with a 30 (b)(6) witness if investigation of the cases list provided by Defendant but not submitted to Plaintiff's counsel until the night before the 30(b)(6) provides grounds as discussed. Defendant is not required to provide any additional information to Plaintiff. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No: Courtroom Deputy: 14-cv-03193-WJM-KMT Sabrina Grimm Date: January 22, 2016 FTR: Courtroom C-201 Parties: Counsel: LAWRENCE SEIDMAN, Daniel Kay Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Jacquelyn Booker Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING 9:51 a.m. Court in session. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics notice, unreasonable delay and denial, and sanctions. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant to Comply with the 30(b)(6) Deposition [50] is DENIED, for reasons stated on record, but subject to bringing another motion for additional hours with a 30(b)(6) witness if investigation of the cases list provided by Defendant but not submitted to Plaintiff’s counsel until the night before the 30(b)(6) provides grounds as discussed. Defendant is not required to provide any additional information to Plaintiff. 10:48 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total in-court time 00:57 *To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at 303-988-8470.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?