Butt et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/19/2015. Discovery due by 2/29/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 3/31/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty.(mdave, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03208-WJM-MEH
JUDITH BUTT, and
DONALD BUTT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 19, 2015.
Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [filed August 18, 2015;
docket #38]. The parties’ primary basis for seeking a six-month extension of discovery deadlines
is the time period during which they had to wait “until the scope of discovery had been fully
defined”; that is, until Judge Martinez issued a ruling on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. It
appears that the time period between when the motion became ripe and when Judge Martinez
granted the motion was less than four months. Accordingly, the motion is granted in part and
denied in part.
For good cause shown, the Court will modify the paragraph 9 of the Scheduling Order as
follows:
a.
Deadline for fact and expert discovery
February 29, 2016
b.
Deadline for Dispositive Motions
March 31, 2016
d.3.
Deadline for Plaintiff to designate all experts and
provide opposing counsel with all information
specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)1
December 21, 2015
1
The Court notes that the parties inserted dates into paragraph 9(d)(1) of the Scheduling
Order, rather than “identif[ied] anticipated fields of expert testimony.” See docket #15.
However, the Scheduling Order calls for deadlines only for initial and rebuttal expert disclosures
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2).
d.4.
Deadline for Defendant to designate all experts and
provide opposing counsel with all information
specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)
January 21, 2016
In addition, a Final Pretrial Conference will be held on May 26, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in
Courtroom A501 on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street,
Denver, Colorado.
The parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order, pursuant to District of Colorado
Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.L. no later than five (5) business days prior to the
pretrial conference. The proposed pretrial order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the
ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., WordPerfect or Word only) and shall
be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Hegarty_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov.
Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial
order on paper to the Clerk’s Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it
is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of
Colorado ECF Procedures.
The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form
which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the court’s website at
http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx. Instructions for downloading in richtext format are
posted in the forms section of the website.
All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C. Colo. LAttyR 3 prior to the pretrial
conference.
The parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the court will grant the relief
requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a court-ordered conference or to comply with a courtordered deadline which has not been vacated by court order may result in the imposition of
sanctions.
Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States
Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2(b).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?