Surf 9, LLC v. Sports Authority, Inc., The et al
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER; 51 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/26/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03260-REB-KLM
SURF 9, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE SPORTS AUTHORITY, and
EASTMAN FOOTWEAR GROUP, INC.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Amend
Scheduling Order [#51] (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#51] is GRANTED. The Scheduling
Order is amended to extend the following deadlines: (1) The deadline to respond to
infringement contentions and produce accompany documents is extended to September
28, 2015. (2) The deadline to submit invalidity contentions and claims charts and produce
accompanying items of prior art is extended to September 28, 2015. (3) The deadline to
submit invalidity contentions and claim charts and produce accompanying documents is
extended to November 9, 2015. (4) The deadline to exchange list of claim limitations to
be construed and proposed construction is extended to December 7, 2015. (5) The
deadline to submit the joint disputed claim limitation chart is extended to January 4, 2016.
(6) The deadline to submit opening claim construction brief and supporting evidence is
extended to February 1, 2016. (7) The deadline to respond to the opening claim
construction brief and supporting evidence is extended to February 22, 2016. (8) The
deadline to submit a reply brief in support of the opening claim construction brief is
extended to March 14, 2016. (9) The two-hour claim construction hearing shall be held in
or around May 2016.
Dated: August 26, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?