USA v. Olsen et al

Filing 30

ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 29 is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendant Olsens Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 6 is DENIED, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/10/2015.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03302-WJM-KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARL F. OLSEN, and
EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING MAY 22, 2015 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE,
DENYING DEFENDANT OLSEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS
______________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court on the May 22, 2015 Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 29) that
Defendant Carl F. Olsen’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) be denied. The
Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due
within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No.
29, at 7.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation have to date been received.
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analysis was thorough and
sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b) advisory committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only
satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the

recommendation.”); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In
the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate’s report under
any standard it deems appropriate.”).
In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(1)

The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED in its
entirety;

(2)

Defendant Olsen’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.
Dated this 10th day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

_________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge

2