Kilthau v. Low T Medical Clinic, Inc.

Filing 11

MINUTE ORDER: Granting 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve by Mail. Granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference 2/5/2015 10:00 AM is vacated. Scheduling Conference re-set for 3/4/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Deadline to file Pilot Program Consent Form 2/18/2015. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/15/2015. (emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03309-MJW RAYMOND KILTHAU, Plaintiff, v. LOW T MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve by Mail (Docket No. 9) is GRANTED. The Court finds that Plaintiff has used all due diligence to obtain personal service, that Defendant’s registered agent is not located under his name at his assigned address, and that Defendant’s registered agent cannot with reasonable diligence be served. Plaintiff is hereby authorized to serve process upon Defendant pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes Sec. 7-90-704(2). As required by that statute, the process shall be served “by registered mail or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the entity at its principal address.” It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference (Docket No. 10) is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference set for February 5, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RE-SET for March 4, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. Associated deadlines under Rules 16 and 26 and the Local Civ il Rules are extended accordingly. It is further ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to file the consent form under the Pilot Program, consenting to or declining magistrate judge jurisdiciton under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c), is extended to February 18, 2015. Date: January 15, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?