Marcantonio v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Filing 36

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/20/15. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference [#33] is GRANTED. Scheduling Conference is RESET to 2/19/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom A401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix.(lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03313-RM-KLM
AMY MARCANTONIO,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and
Reset Scheduling Conference [#33]1 (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#33] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for February 17,
2015 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to February 19, 20152 at 10:30 a.m. in
Courtroom A-401 of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,
Colorado.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling
order pursuant to the District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures. The
parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than February 12, 2015.
Dated: January 20, 2015

1

“[#33]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
2

In the Motion Defendant noted that the parties are available on February 4, 10, and 11.
Motion [#33] at 1-2. However, the Court is unable to accommodate Defendant’s request to
reschedule the Scheduling Conference on those days. If the parties are unable to attend the
February 19, 2015 Scheduling Conference, they may call chambers at [phone] to discuss
the Court’s availability prior to filing another motion regarding the date of the Scheduling
Conference.