Mortland v. Jarosz Family LTD. Partnership

Filing 33

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/08/16 GRANTING 32 Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. The Court RETAINS JURISDICTION solely for the purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement, if necessary. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03337-NYW DEREK MORTLAND, Plaintiff, v. JAROSZ FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIP, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang This matter is before the court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice with Court’s Retention of Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement (“Stipulated Motion to Dismiss”) [#32, filed February 4, 2016] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the Order of Reference for all purposes dated August 19, 2015 [#26]. The court has reviewed the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss that represents that the Parties have reached a full and final settlement of this action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice with Court’s Retention of Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement (“Stipulated Motion to Dismiss”) [#32] is GRANTED; (2) This action (including all claims and/or counterclaims) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) The Court RETAINS JURISDICTION solely for the purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement, if necessary; and, (4) Except as otherwise specifically agreed to by the Parties, each party shall pay their own fees and costs. DATED: February 8, 2016 BY THE COURT: s/ Nina Y. Wang United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?