Griffith v. State of Colorado et al

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/14/15. Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Case Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) # 29 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED withou t prejudice as to all Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel # 17 and the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) # 20 are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk's Office shall close this case.(lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03377-KLM
DARLENE GRIFFITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF COLORADO,
RICK RAEMISH, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive director
of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
ROGER WERHOLTZ, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive
director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
TONY CAROCHI, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive director
of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
TOM CLEMENTS by the through his estate, in his individual capacity and in his official
capacity as executive director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
ARISTEDES ZAVARIS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive
director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
JOE ORTIZ, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive director of the
Colorado Department of Corrections,
JOHN SUTHERS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as executive director
of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY KRISTEN L. MIX, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Case
Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) [#29]1 (the “Motion”). In the
Motion, Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, states that she “wishes to withdraw this case
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).” Motion [#29] at 1.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#29] is GRANTED.
1

“[#29]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without
prejudice as to all Defendants.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel [#17]
and the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) [#20] are DENIED
as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office shall close this case.
Dated: May 14, 2015

2