Ross v. Clark

Filing 11

ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and, if appropriate, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 02/18/15. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03399-GPG DELISE ROSS,1 Plaintiff, v. DANIEL CLARK, Aurora Police Officer, Defendant. ORDER DRAWING CASE After review pursuant to D.C.COLOLCivR 8.1(a), the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate f or summary dismissal and should be drawn to a presiding judge and, if appropriate, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if appropriate, to a magistrate judge. DATED February 18, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: S/ Gordon P. Gallagher United States Magistrate Judge 1 In a previous Order (ECF No. 8), the Court identified the Plaintiff in the caption as “Delise Ross, a/k/a Delaree Ross.” The Court mistakenly believed that Delise Ross and Delaree Ross were one in the same because of their nearly identical handwriting and style of writing. However, it has come to the Court’s attention that Ms. Delise Ross is the sister of Delaree Ross. (See ECF No. 9). Accordingly, the caption has been amended to reflect Delise Ross as the Plaintiff, with no alias. Unlike Delaree Ross, Delise Ross does not have a pending case in this Court, or a case terminated within 12 months of her filing. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(1). Therefore, this case is being assigned by random draw, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?