GEF Services, LLC v. Casazza et al

Filing 42

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/19/2015. Plaintiff's Motion to Defer Consideration of Defendant Jim D. Burford's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 38 ) is GRANTED as follows finding good cause shown. Plain tiff shall take the depositions of Defendant Jim D. Burford and James White by 6/15/2015, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 7/14/2015, to file any supplement Response to Defendant Jim D. Burford's Motion to Dis miss or, in the Alternative, Motion forSummary Judgment (docket no. 21 ). This court will defer ruling on Defendant Jim D.Burford' s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 21 ) until on or after 7/15/2015. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03480-CMA-MJW GEF SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SEAN CASAZZA, JIM D. BURFORD, ADRIAN RAMIREZ, ENERGY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC, PATRICK LEO RUSHING and UNLIMITED MOBILE TIRE, LLC, Defendant MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Consideration of Defendant Jim D. Burford’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 38) is GRANTED as follows finding good cause shown. Plaintiff shall take the depositions of Defendant Jim D. Burford and James White by June 15, 2015, as previously ordered. See docket no. 40. Plaintiff shall have up to and including July 14, 2015, to file any supplement Response to Defendant Jim D. Burford’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 21). This court will defer ruling on Defendant Jim D. Burford’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 21) until on or after July 15, 2015. Date: May 19, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?