GEF Services, LLC v. Casazza et al
Filing
42
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 05/19/2015. Plaintiff's Motion to Defer Consideration of Defendant Jim D. Burford's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 38 ) is GRANTED as follows finding good cause shown. Plain tiff shall take the depositions of Defendant Jim D. Burford and James White by 6/15/2015, as previously ordered. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 7/14/2015, to file any supplement Response to Defendant Jim D. Burford's Motion to Dis miss or, in the Alternative, Motion forSummary Judgment (docket no. 21 ). This court will defer ruling on Defendant Jim D.Burford' s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 21 ) until on or after 7/15/2015. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-03480-CMA-MJW
GEF SERVICES, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL SEAN CASAZZA,
JIM D. BURFORD,
ADRIAN RAMIREZ,
ENERGY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC,
PATRICK LEO RUSHING and
UNLIMITED MOBILE TIRE, LLC,
Defendant
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Defer Consideration of Defendant
Jim D. Burford’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 38) is GRANTED as follows
finding good cause shown. Plaintiff shall take the depositions of Defendant Jim D.
Burford and James White by June 15, 2015, as previously ordered. See docket no. 40.
Plaintiff shall have up to and including July 14, 2015, to file any supplement Response
to Defendant Jim D. Burford’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for
Summary Judgment (docket no. 21). This court will defer ruling on Defendant Jim D.
Burford’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment
(docket no. 21) until on or after July 15, 2015.
Date: May 19, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?