GEF Services, LLC v. Casazza et al

Filing 63

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Depositions of Patrick Leo Rushing and Unlimited Mobile Tire, LLC and Extending the Time to Respond to Discovery by Them Until, Thirty Days After They are Deposed, as set forth in the order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/5/2016.(emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-03480-CMA-MJW GEF SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SEAN CASAZZA, JIM D. BURFORD, ENERGY TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS, LLC, PATRICK LEO RUSHING and UNLIMITED MOBILE TIRE, LLC, Defendant MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Depositions of Patrick Leo Rushing and Unlimited Mobile Tire, LLC and Extending the Time to Respond to Discovery by Them Until, Thirty Days After They are Deposed (docket no. 51) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the following reasons. After careful review of the subject motion (docket no. 51), the response (docket no. 55), and the reply (docket no. 61), I find that counsel, for both sides, have “failed to communicate” and have failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.1. Defendants state in paragraph 6 in their response (docket no. 55) the following: “Defendants Rushing and UMT do not seek, and have not sought, to prevent or impede Plaintiff from deposing them in this matter.” Accordingly, it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer within five (5) days of this Minute Order and set the depositions of Defendants Rushing and UMT forthwith. Moreover, Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s outstanding written discovery requests on or before January 15, 2016. Each party to pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion. Date: January 5, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?