Apodaca v. Lakewood Police Department et al

Filing 99

ORDER Striking Objections re: 96 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Jose M. Apodaca, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 03/28/2016. (cthom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 15-cv-00007-RM-KLM JOSE M. APODACA, Plaintiff, v. ZBIGNIEW RICHARD KOSIK, Police Officer, in his official capacity, and ZBIGNIEW RICHARD KOSIK, in his individual capacity, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Objections to Order and Recommendations of United State Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Fed R Civ P Rule 72” (the “Objection”) (ECF No. 96), objecting to the February 23, 2016, Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 93). Upon consideration of the Objection, the court file, the applicable rules and case law, and being otherwise fully advised, Plaintiff’s Objection is STRICKEN. As an initial matter, Plaintiff proceeds pro se. While the Court construes Plaintiff’s papers liberally and holds them to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), the Court still requires Plaintiff to follow the procedural rules, see Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (pro se litigant is not relieved of burden of alleging sufficient facts to state a recognized legal claim). Plaintiff’s Objection is untimely. The Recommendation was issued on February 23,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?