Maes v. Leprino Foods Company

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER; 35 Motion for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(b) is denied without prejudice for Defendants failure to explainwhy the proposed protective order is necessary in this case given the provisions already set forth in Rule 502(b), by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/17/15.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00022-WJM-MEH
DOROTHY MAES,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 17, 2015.
Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(b) [filed
September 15, 2015; docket #35] is denied without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to explain
why the proposed protective order is necessary in this case given the provisions already set forth in
Rule 502(b). In other words, the proposed order appears to provide no additional protection to the
parties other than that already provided in the rules.