McDonald v. National Title Clearing Inc.

Filing 62

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 38 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer; denying without prejudice 41 Motion to Supplement; denying 55 Motion for Judicial Notice, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/09/2015. The Court will hear three of the remaining pending motions 43 45 and 58 at the previously scheduled hearing on 7/17/2015 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom A501. (slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00027-MSK-MEH R. KIRK MCDONALD, Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING, INC., and ERIKA LANCE, individually and in her official capacity as employee/supervisor for Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 9, 2015. Upon further review of the pending Motions in the above-captioned case, the Court orders the following. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer [filed June 3, 2015; docket #38] and Plaintiff’s Proposed Motion to Supplement [filed June 10, 2015; docket #41] are both denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 15.1(b). Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Notice [filed June 29, 2015; docket #55] is denied. Plaintiff fails to provide legal and factual justification for the Court to take judicial notice at this stage of the litigation. The Court will hear three of the remaining pending motions (see dockets ##43, 45, 58) at the previously scheduled hearing to be held on July l7, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A501 on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2(b).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?