McDonald v. National Title Clearing Inc.

Filing 71

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: denying 43 Motion Alter the Court's Scheduling Order for Defendant's Failure to Cooperate in Discovery; denying 45 Motion for Protective O rder; granting 58 Motion to Stay; granting 64 Motion for Relief from Minute Order denying 69 Amended Motion Judicial Notice; Motion Hearing held on 7/17/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any subpoena issued in this case for discovery purposes is QUASHED in accordance with the stay. FTR: Courtroom A 501. (mdave, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty Civil Action No: Courtroom Deputy: 1:15-cv-00027-MSK-MEH Molly Davenport Date: July 17, 2015 FTR: Courtroom A 501 Parties: Counsel: R. KIRK MCDONALD Pro se Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL TITLE CLEARING INC. ET AL Thomas Burke Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER STATUS CONFERENCE AND MOTION HEARING Court in session: 1:42 p.m. The Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding the status of discovery ORDERED: [43] MOTION to Alter the Court's Scheduling Order for Defendant's Failure to Conperate [sic] in Discovery by Plaintiff is DENIED AS MOOT. [45] MOTION for Protective Order by Defendants is DENIED AS MOOT. [58] MOTION to Stay by Defendants is GRANTED. [64] Motion for Relief from Minute Order is GRANTED. [69] Amended MOTION for Judicial Notice Dated July 14, 2015 by Plaintiff is DENIED. Court in recess: 2:23 p.m. Court in session: 2:35 p.m. Mark Willis made an appearance for Chase Bank regarding a subpoena that they received from the plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any subpoena issued in this case for discovery purposes is QUASHED in accordance with the stay. Court in recess: 2:43 p.m. (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 00:49 To obtain a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?