Atkins v. HCA-Healthone, LLC

Filing 25

MINUTE ORDER re: 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (the "Motion") and Defendants Status Report Regarding Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Docket #16) 24 (the Status Report). The Motion 16 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept PlaintiffsAmended Complaint and Jury Demand [16-1] for filing as of June 17, 2015, the date the Status Report 24 was filed. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/18/15.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00037-WYD-KLM
BETHANY ATKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
HCA-HEALTHONE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Rose
Medical Center,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended
Complaint and Jury Demand [#16]1 (the “Motion”) and Defendant’s Status Report
Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand
(Docket #16) [#24] (the “Status Report”).
In the Status Report, Defendant states that It does not oppose the Motion. Status
Report [#24] at 1. Therefore, Plaintiff may file her proposed Amended Complaint and Jury
Demand [#16-1] pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) because she has “the opposing party’s
written consent.” As a result, a Court order is not necessary. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#16] is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [#16-1] for filing as of June 17, 2015, the date the
Status Report [#24] was filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to
the Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated: June 18, 2015

1

“[#16]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.