Atkins v. HCA-Healthone, LLC

Filing 41

MINUTE ORDER; 39 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File SecondAmended Complaint and Jury Demand is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint on or before October 9, 2015.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond tothe Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/1/15.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00037-WYD-KLM
BETHANY ATKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
HCA-HEALTHONE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Rose
Medical Center,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to File Second
Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [#39]1 (the “Motion”). The Motion is unopposed
and, therefore is filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff filed “as
an exhibit a copy of the amended pleading which strikes through (e.g. strikes through) the
text to be deleted and underlines (e.g. underlines) the text to be added.” See generally
Motion, Ex. 1 [#39-1]. However, Plaintiff did not file the proposed Second Amended
Complaint. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#39] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint
on or before October 9, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to
the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated: October 1, 2015

1

“[#39]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.