Atkins v. HCA-Healthone, LLC
MINUTE ORDER; 39 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File SecondAmended Complaint and Jury Demand is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint on or before October 9, 2015.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond tothe Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/1/15.(morti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00037-WYD-KLM
HCA-HEALTHONE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Rose
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to File Second
Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [#39]1 (the “Motion”). The Motion is unopposed
and, therefore is filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff filed “as
an exhibit a copy of the amended pleading which strikes through (e.g. strikes through) the
text to be deleted and underlines (e.g. underlines) the text to be added.” See generally
Motion, Ex. 1 [#39-1]. However, Plaintiff did not file the proposed Second Amended
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#39] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint
on or before October 9, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to
the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated: October 1, 2015
“[#39]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?