Cota Martinez et al v. Xclusive Management LLC et al
Filing
15
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/28/15. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00047-MSK-MEH
MARIA DEL ROSARIO COTA MARTINEZ,
MARIO RINCON ROSALES, and
ARACELI ZAVALA RAMIREZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
XCLUSIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC,
XCLUSIVE STAFFING, INC.,
XCLUSIVE STAFFING OF COLORADO, LLC,
OMNI INTERLOCKEN COMPANY, LLC,
OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,
CHRISTINA CHAVEZ, and
HUMBERO PATRON,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the affidavits in support of the motions for leave to
proceed without prepayment of fees or security pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court has granted
the Plaintiffs leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It now is
ORDERED that, if appropriate, the Clerk shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from
the Defendants. If unable to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint,
summons, order granting leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and all other orders upon
the Defendants. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these
documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United
States. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants or counsel for the Defendants shall respond to
the complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process on the
Defendants.
Dated this 28th day of January, 2015 in Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?