Sardina et al v. Charles et al
ORDER Granting 89 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff, Margarita Lopez From This Case Without Prejudice, and the caption shall be amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/15/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00054-REB-KLM
MARISOL SARDINA A/K/A ALEJANDRA ARREDONDO,
COLUMBA RODRIGUEZ A/K/A ANABEL ECHEVERRIA,
MARGARITA HERRERA A/K/A JESSICA GONZALEZ,
ALBERTO ECHEVERRIA A/K/A JESUS F. GONZALEZ,
BLANCA AVILA A/K/A ROSA MEDINA,
PATRICIA ALEJANDRE GARCIA A/K/A ANA MONCADA,
JESSICA MORALES TAVERA,
MARIA QUINONES M. A/K/A KARIME DOMINGUEZ,
ROSAURA ZAVALA A/K/A ALEJANDRA GUTIERREZ,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
TWIN ARCHES PARTNERSHIP, LTD,
LORENA ESTRADA, and
in their individual and corporate capacities,
ORDER DISMISSING A PARTY
The matter is before me on the Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion To Dismiss
Plaintiff, Margarita Lopez From This Case Without Prejudice [#89]1 filed November
24, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion
should be granted and that plaintiff Margarita Lopez should be dismissed without
“[#89]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff, Margarita
Lopez From This Case Without Prejudice is granted:
2. That the claims of plaintiff, Margarita Lopez, against the defendants, are
dismissed without prejudice; and
3. That plaintiff, Margarita Lopez, is dismissed and is dropped as a party to this
action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly.
Dated December 15, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?