Fitness Together Franchise Corporation v. Piranio et al

Filing 16

MINUTE ORDER granting 13 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Responses due by 1/21/2015, and Replies due by 1/26/2015 re: 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/20/2015. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00063-REB-KLM
FITNESS TOGETHER FRANCHISE CORPORATION, a Arizona corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER PIRANIO, an individual,
ANNETTE PIRANIO, an individual, and
PIRANIO FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., a Wisconsin Corporation,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER1

The matter before me is defendants’ Unopposed Motion To Amend
Scheduling Order [#13],2 filed January 16, 2015. I find and conclude that the motion is
well-taken and thus grant the relief requested therein.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That defendants’ Unopposed Motion To Amend Scheduling Order [#13],
filed January 16, 2015, is GRANTED;
2. That the Scheduling Order [#12], filed January 12, 2015, is AMENDED as
follows:
a. That defendants SHALL FILE responses (or a consolidated response)
to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [#3], filed January 9, 2015, by
January 21, 2015; and

1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.
Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
2
“[#13]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

b. That plaintiff SHALL FILE a reply to any corresponding response by
January 26, 2015; and
3. That the change in these deadlines shall not effect the date currently
scheduled for the hearing of this matter (if such is deemed necessary), as set forth more
fully in the Scheduling Order [#12], filed January 12, 2015.
Dated: January 20, 2015.

2