Peruch-Vicente v. Longshore
Filing
3
ORDER To Respondent to File a Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/14/15. (nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00068-GPG
EVELIN ADELA PERUCH-VICENTE,
Applicant,
v.
JOHN LONGSHORE, U.S. DHS-ICE,
UNKNOWN ICE OR BI INCORP. “JAILER,”
Respondents.
ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
Applicant, Evelyn Adela Peruch-Vicente, alleges that she is in the custody of
federal immigration authorities or a contracting agency. She has filed pro se an
Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1).
Applicant has paid the $5.00 filing fee.
As part of the preliminary consideration of the Amended Application for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in this case and pursuant to Keck v.
Hartley, 550 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has determined that a limited
Preliminary Response is appropriate. Respondent is directed pursuant to Rule 4 of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts to file a
Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative defense of exhaustion of
administrative remedies under Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1203 (10th Cir. 2010), as
well as any jurisdictional issues. If Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative
defense, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary
Response. Respondent may not file a dispositive motion as a Preliminary Response, or
an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to this Order.
In support of the Preliminary Response, Respondent should attach as exhibits all
relevant portions of the administrative record, including but not limited to copies of all
documents demonstrating whether Applicant has exhausted administrative remedies.
Applicant may reply to the Preliminary Response and provide any information
that might be relevant to the exhaustion of administrative remedies. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order
Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the
Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if she desires. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative
defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of
that decision in the Preliminary Response.
Dated: January 14, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/ Gordon P. Gallagher
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?