Valdez v. Derrick, III et al
Filing
12
ORDER Upon consideration of the Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss 8 , plaintiff's response 9 and plaintiff's Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint 10 . Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file a "clean" Amended Complaint on or before July 27, 2015, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/21/15.(ktera, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00109-RPM
MICHAEL VALDEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER DERRICK III, Denver Police Officer, in his individual and in his official capacities;
JOHN MCDONALD, Denver Police Officer, in his individual and in his official capacities;
ROBERT MOTYKA, JR., Denver Police Officer, in his individual and in his official capacities;
JEFF MOTZ, Denver Police Officer, in his individual and in his official capacities;
KARL ROLLER, Denver Police Officer, in his individual and in his official capacities; and
CITY OF DENVER,
Defendants.
_________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
_________________________________________________________________________
Upon consideration of the Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8], plaintiff’s
response [Doc. 9] and plaintiff’s Notice of Filing of Amended Complaint [Doc. 10], it is
ORDERED that Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a “clean” Amended Complaint on or
before July 27, 2015.
DATED: July 21st, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?