Rodgers v. Sinker et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Scheduling Order. Deadline for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings is 12/3/2015. Discovery due by 4/13/2016. Dispositive Motions due by 5/13/2016. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/30/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/3/15.(nywlc1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00174-CMA-NYW
RICHARD “NIKKI” RODGERS,
JODI SINKER, Nurse 3 of CTCF, Clinical Services, and
ZUPAN, Warden CTCF, FNU,
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action is before the court on the “Joint Stipulation to Modify Scheduling
Order” (the “Motion”). [#74, filed October 29, 2015]. This matter was referred to this
Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated March 6, 2015 [#11] and the
memorandum dated October 30, 2015 [#76].
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART:
1. The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures on or before November 18, 2015;
2. The deadline for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings is extended to December
3. The Parties shall complete all discovery by April 13, 2016;
4. The Parties shall file dispositive motions, if any, on or before May 13, 2016;
5. The Parties shall designate expert witnesses on or before February 12, 2016;
6. The Parties shall designate rebuttal expert witnesses on or before March 14, 2016; and
7. The Final Pretrial Conference set for February 18, 2016 is VACATED and reset for July
7, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-205, Second Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States
Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The proposed Pretrial Order is due
seven (7) days prior to the Final Pretrial Conference.
DATED: November 3, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?