Burkhart v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 43 Motion for Confidentiality and Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/3/2015.(mdave, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00187-WJM-MEH
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 3, 2015.
The Unopposed Motion for Confidentiality and Protective Order [filed October 30, 2015;
docket #43] is denied without prejudice for the parties’ failure to address why a second protective
order is required in this case. The Court’s Minute Order of October 30, 2015, denying without
prejudice the parties’ Motion for an additional protective order, explicitly noted:
[S]hould the parties choose to submit a revised proposed order, the Court also
requires an explanation as to why the existing Protective Order issued June 25, 2015
[see docket #31] could not be amended to accomplish the purposes the parties
Furthermore, the Court instructs the parties to correct typographical errors in any future
submission they choose to file. For example, the fourth paragraph of the proposed order states: “If
no agreement as to the documents can be reached he [sic] designating party will timely file a motion
... .” See docket #143-1 at 2.
In addition, should the parties choose to again re-file, the parties shall submit to Chambers
a copy of the proposed protective order in useable format (Word, WordPerfect) by email at
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?