Aronstein et al v. Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. et al

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/5/15 re: Defendants' Motion to Reconsider and Vacate the Court's March 3, 2015 Order Striking Defendants' February 13, 2015 Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion Seeking Leave to File 39-Page Motion to Dismiss 19 . To the extent Defendants seek leave to file a 39-page Motion to Dismiss, the Motionis GRANTED for the reasons stated therein; and Defendants' Motion is DENIED as to all other matters. (bsimm, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 15-cv-00204-RM-NYW
DAVID ARONSTEIN,
LESLEY STROLL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC.,
KEVIN LOUGHREY,
PAMELA SAXTON,
PAMELA SOLLY,
JAMES L. FREER,
JAMES P. GEYER,
TIMOTHY J. HADDON,
CAROL T. BANDUCCI,
THOMAS J. ONEIL,
DENIS C. ARSENAULT,
WENDY CASSITY,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Defendants Thompson Creek Metals
Company Inc., Kevin Loughrey, Pamela Saxton, Pamela Solly, James L. Freer, Timothy J.
Haddon, and Wendy Cassity’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Reconsider and Vacate the
Court’s March 4, 2015 Order Striking Defendants’ February 13, 2015 Motion to Dismiss, or, in
the Alternative, Motion Seeking Leave to File 39-Page Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). [#19,
filed March 4, 2015]. Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated February 20, 2015 [#16] and
the memorandum dated March 4, 2015 [#20], this matter was referred to this Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED:
1. To the extent Defendants seek leave to file a 39-page Motion to Dismiss, the Motion
is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein; and
2. Defendants’ Motion is DENIED as to all other matters.

DATED: March 5, 2015