Aronstein et al v. Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/9/15. A Scheduling Conference is set for 4/3/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00204-RM-NYW DAVID ARONSTEIN, LESLEY STROLL, Plaintiffs, v. THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC., KEVIN LOUGHREY, PAMELA SAXTON, PAMELA SOLLY, JAMES L. FREER, JAMES P. GEYER, TIMOTHY J. HADDON, CAROL T. BANDUCCI, THOMAS J. ONEIL, DENIS C. ARSENAULT, WENDY CASSITY, Defendants. ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IT IS ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set for April 3, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-205, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United State Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b). A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. DATED: March 9, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Nina Y. Wang__________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?