Aronstein et al v. Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. et al

Filing 39

MINUTE ORDER denying 35 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/23/2015.(tscha, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00204-RM-NYW DAVID ARONSTEIN, LESLEY STROLL, Plaintiffs, v. THOMPSON CREEK METALS COMPANY INC., KEVIN LOUGHREY, PAMELA SAXTON, PAMELA SOLLY, JAMES L. FREER, JAMES P. GEYER, TIMOTHY J. HADDON, CAROL T. BANDUCCI, THOMAS J. ONEIL, DENIS C. ARSENAULT, WENDY CASSITY, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang This civil action is before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion for Leave”). [#35, filed March 20, 2015]. Also before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of this court’s March 18, 2015 Minute Order (“Motion for Reconsideration”). [#37, filed March 23, 2015]. These matters were referred to this Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated February 20, 2015 [#16] and the memoranda filed March 20, 2015 [#36] and March 23, 2015 [#38], respectively. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Motion for Leave [#35] is DENIED for lack of good cause shown and for Plaintiffs’ failure to satisfy their obligation pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a); 2. The Motion for Reconsideration [#37] is DENIED as moot in light of the Minute Order entered March 20, 2015 [#34]. DATED: March 23, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?