Scarborough v. USA

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/22/16. Motion to Compel USP Lewisburg's Warden to Produce the Plaintiff's Discovery Materials to Plaintiff Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and 34 # 31 is DENIED as moot.(lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00242-KLM AARON SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel USP Lewisburg’s Warden to Produce the Plaintiff’s Discovery Materials to Plaintiff Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and 34 [#31] (the “Motion”). Defendant filed a Response [#32] in opposition to the Motion. Plaintiff did not file a Reply. The issue here concerns how documents were produced, as opposed to which documents were or were not produced. Defendant responded to Plaintiff’s written discovery requests partially in hard-copy format and partially with documents on a compact disc. Response [#32]. Plaintiff appears to have initially refused the offer of a laptop from his prison facility so that he could review these documents. However, after the filing of the Motion [#31], Plaintiff appears to have changed his mind and, so far as the Court can now discern, he has had the opportunity to review these documents electronically. See Aff. of Diltz [#32-2] ¶ 8. Thus, the issue raised by the Motion [#31] appears to be moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#31] is DENIED as moot. Dated: January 22, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?