Jones v. Esurance Insurance Company

Filing 27

ORDER denying as moot Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 24 . ORDERED that on or before December 14, 2015, the parties will provide the Court with a proposed briefing schedule regarding the following issue: whether Defendant is entitled to either (1) a set-off of damages based on Plaintiff's recovery of workers' compensation benefits or (2) introduce evidence of such recovery into evidence. Signed by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/19/15.(jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 15-cv-00278-CMA-KLM ERIC C. JONES, Plaintiff, v. ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 24) On October 27, 2015, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 24.) Several weeks after that motion was filed, and before it was decided, the parties filed a stipulation regarding issues and claims for trial, in which the parties stated that the stipulation “resolves the issues in Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24) and makes the motion moot.” (Doc. # 25.) The Court expresses its appreciation to the parties for saving the Court time and resources by resolving among themselves the issues underlying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and notifying the Court in a timely manner of such resolution. Based on the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 24) is DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that on or before December 14, 2015, the parties will provide the Court with a proposed briefing schedule regarding the following issue: whether Defendant is entitled to either (1) a set-off of damages based on Plaintiff’s recovery of workers’ compensation benefits or (2) introduce evidence of such recovery into evidence. DATED: November 19, 2015 BY THE COURT: CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?