Lesniewski v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al

Filing 18

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/20/15. Unopposed Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice # 17 is DENIED without prejudice.(lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 15-cv-00290-KLM DANIEL LESNIEWSKI, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice [#17] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#17] is DENIED without prejudice. Due to constraints on the jurisdiction of the undersigned as the assigned Magistrate Judge under the Pilot Program to Implement the Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges [#3-1], the undersigned cannot grant the Motion [#17] seeking dismissal of this case. In order to obtain dismissal, the parties may either (1) file a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), or (2) file the Consent Form Pursuant to Pilot Program to Implement the Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges, see [#3-1] at 8-9, indicating that all parties consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this civil action, including trial, and to enter a final judgment. Plaintiff may filed a renewed Unopposed Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice if the parties choose to follow (2) above. If all parties do not consent, the case will be drawn to a District Judge. Dated: July 20, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?